Geries Shaheen • March 8, 2019

Death's Remnant

*If you have recently lost someone, please be cautious reading this article.

It happens so quickly, and in so many different ways. One thing is similar in all accounts of death though, they end, and we keep going. At least, we keep going to some degree. We may keep breathing, but feel stuck in an empty life without the person.

Yet, for others, it may be a celebration. No more pain, or having lived a full life. Some deaths are more horrid than others. Some leave a tinge of confusing emotions. Remnants of guilt, despair, pain, fear, and even anger. These are the deaths that leave a chilling void in our hearts. They leave us begging to let go, but screaming to hold on.

This is the wife of the husband who was found on the bottom of the stairs with a knife in his chest.

The sister of the lonely aunt who left her dress shoes at the lake dock before drowning herself.

The mother of the son who overdosed one last time.

The children of the mother taken too soon by depression.

The accounts hold many different details, many different shades. They carry many different reasons to end up feeling a high degree of hopelessness.

Hopelessness is a very real emotion. It holds a dangerous formula. Hopelessness is humanities oldest trick. Without a strong anchor, hopelessness projects the depths of the lost ones emotion and washes it over the person left grieving. Its like a mental cancer. The classic label of copy cat suicides is based off this experience.

The truth about hopelessness is that it is only valid when we choose to not reach for other emotions. It becomes all encompassing, all consuming when we let it grow, and squeeze out any room for other emotions. We find ourselves projecting the death of a loved one onto ourselves and often our higher power. This leaves our identities, and our faith shattered.

A counseling supervisor once told me "Feelings are very real, but they don't have to define reality.". I have let that phrase swim in my mind daily. Why? Because the more I repeat it, the more I grow aware of my existence. The more control I gain over my emotive responses.

It is true, we have the ability to regulate our emotions, to practice distress tolerance, and even erase complete memories out of our mind, but how does that help us process the occurrence? It doesn't! There is no perfect choice for how to process death, or work through grief. There is no timeline, there are no real rules. Which makes the engagement so much more difficult for beings who feed off of clarity and data.

At the end of the day, it is not a therapists responsibility to persuade clients to desire healing, or process death.

If a therapist can persuade a client to desire healing, it means the client can also be persuaded by someone/ something else to desire destruction. Only the client can desire true healing. And they may not want it yet!

The client may find their symptoms familiar, oddly satisfying, or very natural to their grieving process. Often times symptoms of stress do not have to translate as self harm or suicide. While it is not a therapists role to persuade healing, we can implement assessments, offer coping skills, and develop safety plans.

"I'm feeling hopeless" is a phrase that is commonly expressed. A client must ask themselves "What will validate and ensure that this feeling of hopelessness will stay forever? The answer is nothing. Reasons given can be understandable, but they do not have to be true. Humanity gives reason for almost everything. We figure out how things work, and why things happen.

With mental health it is a little more complicated. We may say "I'm feeling hopeless because my wife passed away." which later becomes "I'm hopeless because I'm meaningless without her." which even later becomes "I'm hopeless because now life has no meaning.". What initially was a blanket statement turns out to be a layered thought concept, sourced in untruth.

We tend to avoid our responsibility of working away from hopelessness, we naturally desire positivism to happen to us. We tell ourselves these lies:

"I will only be hopeful when I experience hope and positivism."

"If I don't have the understanding to this negative experience, then the understanding / data does not exist."

We hold on to pain/ fear/ anger because it is the quickest method of filling the void and granting definition to something otherwise confusing and lacking data. We are great at avoidance, and even better at projection. We find ourselves jumping into the pits of despair without a helmet, without armor, without a shield, without accountability. Then we scream at the face of darkness because of how much it hurts.

How then can we be empowered by the remnants of death, the unfinished business of souls departed, the leftover emotions, loose ends, and painful renditions of bygone memories?

Fritz Perls coined a method called the "Empty Chair", and boy is it powerful. Its a simple practice, conducted in session that provides space and time for closing the chapters of past pain. The client is prompted to envision their loved one sitting in the chair next to them and discuss, argue, release their emotions. The process is much more in depth and time consuming than I've written it out to be.

Throughout this process the client can lean on personal truth statements / beliefs, living each day in righteousness (meaning the person lives in a way beneficial to their wellness and the wellness of those around them), promoting peace, practicing their faith, offering themselves opportunities of salvation away from negativity and into positivism. Lastly, carrying a soothing spirit- exhibiting gentleness, kindness, self control, among other attributes.

These are in no way 'musts' in experiencing the death of others, but they can be power movements away from hopelessness. Have you found yourself processing through grief? What has helped? I would love to know!

*The examples used in this post are fictitious and not intended to represent any real person or case study.

Geries Shaheen is a Provisionally Licensed Professional Counselor operating in and around St. Louis Missouri. Geries teaches psych classes as an Adjunct at Saint Louis Christian College and offers Adolescent/ Family Therapy through Preferred Family Healthcare . Geries holds his BA in Intercultural Studies from Lincoln Christian University, and his MA in Professional Counseling from Lindenwood University. Holding a certificate in Life Coaching, Geries provides life coaching services to clients online throughout the nation

Pioneer Counseling Blog

By Geries Shaheen • October 22, 2026
For a new client (and therapist), the first session can carry plenty of unspoken questions: What am I expected to share? Who will hear about it? What if I’m not ready to talk? Before exploring what brought someone through the door, therapists have an opportunity to make the process clearer, and invite the client into a working partnership. A thoughtful introduction brings together warmth, informed consent, professional boundaries, and client choice. For provisionally licensed counselors, it also means explaining supervision in a way that feels transparent and reassuring. The template below offers a starting point for that conversation. Adapt it to your voice, your practice’s policies, and the person sitting across from you, leaving room for questions along the way. “Hi, I’m _____, a provisional licensed professional counselor in Missouri. I’m glad we could find a time to meet. “You mentioned _____ in your intake paperwork. Today, I’d like to understand those concerns in your own words, learn what you hope will change, and talk together about how I can help. “Before we begin, I want to review a few things about counseling. I practice under the clinical supervision of _____, LPC. My supervisor reviews my clinical work, and we may discuss your care and review relevant records as part of that supervision. “Counseling can help you understand patterns, develop skills, and work toward changes that matter to you. Sometimes discussing difficult experiences brings up uncomfortable feelings. You can tell me when something feels overwhelming, ask to pause, or let me know when an approach is not helping. “Your privacy matters. What you share is confidential, with certain limits explained in our consent paperwork. These include legally required reports of suspected abuse or neglect, situations involving serious safety concerns that may require protective action, and disclosures required by applicable law or a court order. If a legal request for information comes in, we review the requirements before responding. Whenever possible and appropriate, I will discuss a necessary disclosure with you first. “You can talk openly about thoughts of suicide or harming yourself. Having those thoughts does not automatically mean hospitalization; I will ask questions so we can understand your safety needs and determine the appropriate support. “I use _____ approaches. I’ll explain what I recommend, why it may help, and any relevant risks or alternatives. You can ask questions, decline an intervention, and give me feedback. “You’re in the captain’s chair when it comes to your goals and choices. My role is to bring structure, clinical guidance, and attention to safety. We’ll develop a treatment plan together and revisit it as your needs change. If we find that another therapist or service would better meet your needs, we can discuss that and appropriate referrals. “[Review session arrangements, fees, communication boundaries, emergency procedures, and any setting-specific confidentiality policies.] “What questions or concerns do you have about what we’ve reviewed? Are you comfortable proceeding? “What brings you here at this point in your life, and what would you most like help with?” Additional checkboxes: For the remaining first-session checklist, I would add: ☐ Session length, frequency, fees, insurance, and cancellation expectations. ☐ How to contact the therapist, expected response times, and what to do during an emergency or outside office hours. ☐ How records are maintained, who can access them, and any applicable billing disclosures. ☐ Questions, understanding, and documented consent to proceed. ☐ When applicable: telehealth location/privacy/disconnection procedures; guardian involvement and minor confidentiality; couples/group confidentiality policies; mandated treatment and what gets reported to the referring party. ☐ Separate explanation and consent for recording or observation, if used. A clear introduction sets the stage. How you manage the rest of the session helps turn those words into a therapeutic experience. Here are ten practical tips for keeping initial sessions welcoming, purposeful, and within the allotted time. Set a flexible agenda together. Briefly explain what today will include: introductions, informed consent, understanding the client’s concerns, and identifying next steps. Ask what the client most wants to make sure you address. Maintain a steady cadence. Give clients room to think, feel, and respond while keeping an eye on the clock. Use gentle transitions rather than rushing through questions or allowing the opening discussion to consume the entire session. Make time checks collaborative. Try, “We have about twenty minutes left. What feels most important to spend that time on?” This helps clients participate in prioritizing the conversation. Prepare the client for the ending. Offer a reminder about ten minutes before the session ends, then begin closing with enough time to summarize, check emotional readiness, and discuss next steps. A predictable ending helps prevent the client from feeling abruptly cut off. Be thoughtful about opening difficult material late in the session. If a significant concern emerges near the end, acknowledge its importance and assess immediate needs. Collaborate on what can be addressed today and what needs dedicated time next session. Safety concerns require appropriate assessment and action regardless of the clock. Take concise, precise working notes. Capture clinically relevant themes, meaningful changes, interventions provided, the client’s response, and follow-up needs. Brief phrases can support accurate progress-note writing later without turning the session into a transcription exercise. Store all notes according to practice policy and privacy requirements. Keep your attention with the client. Explain why you may jot down a few notes, maintain natural eye contact, and pause writing during emotionally significant moments. Your notes should support your presence in the room. Check understanding in small pieces. Pause during the introduction and informed-consent discussion. “What questions does that bring up?” often invites more conversation than “Does that make sense?” Give the client space to clarify concerns before moving on. Reflect before moving to solutions. Summarize what you understand and ask whether you have it right. Initial sessions can feel crowded with assessment tasks; a brief reflection helps the client feel heard and keeps your clinical understanding grounded in their experience. Close with a shared summary and a clear next step. Identify the main themes, ask what felt useful or difficult, and agree on the next focus. Confirm scheduling and any between-session plan. Complete the progress note promptly afterward, while your recollection is fresh. Use OARS to keep the conversation collaborative. Incorporate open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, and summaries throughout the session. Balance questions with reflections so the client feels heard rather than interviewed. Affirm specific strengths and efforts, and use summaries to check your understanding and transition between topics. Maintain an ongoing mental status lens. Quietly observe the client’s presentation throughout the session, including appearance, behavior, speech, mood and affect, thought process, attention, and orientation. Integrate these observations naturally rather than treating the Mental Status Examination (MSE) as a separate interrogation. Ask direct questions when clarification is needed, and document only what you observed or assessed; areas such as thought content, perception, and safety cannot be established through observation alone. Begin developing a diagnostic formulation. Organize the information gathered into possible explanations for the client’s concerns. Consider symptom duration, severity, functional impact, history, cultural context, and potential medical or substance-related contributors. Keep early impressions tentative, distinguish the client’s report from your observations, and identify what additional assessment is needed. Bring diagnostic questions and competing explanations to supervision rather than rushing to a conclusion. The first session does not need to answer every question or uncover every part of a client’s story. It should give the client a clearer understanding of counseling, an opportunity to feel heard, and a voice in what happens next. For developing therapists, balancing connection, assessment, documentation, and time takes practice. Use this introduction and these tips as a flexible guide, then bring your questions and observations to supervision. Notice what helped the conversation flow, where you felt rushed, and what you want to approach differently next time. Aim to end the session with the client knowing three things: what to expect, how they can participate, and that their concerns have been taken seriously. Geries Shaheen is a Licensed Professional Counselor and Nationally Certified Counselor operating in and around St. Louis Missouri. Geries holds his MA in Professional Counseling from Lindenwood University, BA in Intercultural Studies from Lincoln Christian University, and holds a certificate in Life Coaching, Geries provides life coaching services to clients online globally. Geries is EMDR trained and DBT Certified, practicing from a TIC lens.
By Geries Shaheen • August 11, 2026
Conversations about DSM-6 are growing louder in professional spaces . Industry leaders, researchers, and clinicians are sharing insights about what the next revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders may look like. Some projections suggest a potential release window around 2029 to 2030 , though the American Psychiatric Association has not formally confirmed a publication date. For Licensed Professional Counselors, it is important to distinguish between confirmed information and thoughtful speculation. What follows is a grounded overview of both.  What Is Officially Confirmed There has been talks of the next DSM potentially being names something totally different, as well as potentially being a living breathing document housed online rather than a printed material. This has led to thoughts that it will include a full structural overhaul as it aims to find a balance between psychiatric insight as well as lived experience data. At the moment, there has been no official announcement of: A finalized DSM-6 release date A confirmed structural overhaul A change in name Adoption of biomarkers as diagnostic requirements The APA has historically used multi-year committee processes for revision, as documented during the development of DSM-5 (Regier et al., 2013, American Journal of Psychiatry). Any specific timeline, including projections of 2029 to 2030, remains speculative unless formally announced by the APA. Documented Criticisms of the DSM Many of the concerns you listed are well documented in peer-reviewed literature, including in the American Journal of Psychiatry. Historically cited critiques include: • The DSM uses a categorical model, which may not fully capture dimensional or nuanced symptom presentations. • Emphasis on diagnostic reliability has sometimes been prioritized over diagnostic validity. • Limited integration of biological markers despite advances in neuroscience. • Heavy reliance on expert consensus panels. • Concerns about Western cultural bias in diagnostic framing. These critiques have appeared in academic discussions surrounding DSM-5 and broader psychiatric nosology debates (Hyman, 2010; Regier et al., 2013). What is important to note is that these criticisms are part of ongoing scholarly dialogue. They do not automatically predict specific DSM-6 changes. Themes Being Discussed in Professional Circles While not formally confirmed, several themes are widely discussed among researchers and leaders: 1. Greater Dimensional Integration DSM-5 already introduced cross-cutting symptom measures and severity scales. Continued movement toward dimensional models is supported in academic literature (Krueger & Markon, 2014). A future DSM may further integrate dimensional frameworks alongside categorical diagnoses. 2. Stronger Alignment with ICD There has been ongoing effort to harmonize DSM diagnostic codes with the International Classification of Diseases, maintained by the World Health Organization. Future revisions may continue this integration to improve global diagnostic consistency. 3. Inclusion of Biomarkers Despite significant neuroscience research, no current psychiatric diagnosis relies on validated biomarkers. The National Institute of Mental Health developed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to explore biologically informed models. However, RDoC remains a research framework and is not a diagnostic manual. Any integration of biomarkers into DSM-6 would require strong empirical validation, and no official confirmation currently exists that biomarkers will be required for diagnosis. 4. Cultural and Social Determinants DSM-5-TR expanded cultural formulation tools and updated language related to gender and diversity. Ongoing discourse suggests future editions may further incorporate cultural, socioeconomic, and environmental determinants of mental health. 5. Lived Experience Input There is broader movement in healthcare toward incorporating lived experience perspectives. While stakeholder feedback has been part of past revisions, there has been no formal announcement detailing the extent of lived experience integration for DSM-6. The direction of greater inclusivity aligns with contemporary healthcare standards but remains under development. Autism and Potential Diagnostic Shifts Speculation regarding updates to Autism Spectrum Disorder criteria reflects ongoing research around gender differences, masking, and underdiagnosis in women and people of color. Research literature supports the idea that autism presentations may differ across populations. However, there is currently no official confirmation that DSM-6 criteria changes will create a diagnostic surge. Any future criteria updates would require field trials and empirical validation before implementation. Committee Structures The APA historically forms workgroups and task forces organized by diagnostic categories and thematic areas. Planned improvement committees include the "Structure and Dimensions committee", "Functioning and Quality of life committee" "Biomarkers and Biological factors committee" " Socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental determinants of mental health committee". What LPCs Should Do Now Continue practicing under DSM-5-TR standards. Strengthen dimensional assessment skills and measurement-based care. Stay informed through official APA channels and peer-reviewed publications. Approach social media claims with professional caution. :) It is reasonable to expect that DSM-6 will aim to reflect scientific advances, cultural responsiveness, and improved diagnostic validity. However, until the American Psychiatric Association releases formal statements, timelines, or draft criteria, any detailed structural predictions remain speculative. For Licensed Professional Counselors, preparation is less about anticipating dramatic changes and more about maintaining strong assessment practices, cultural competence, and evidence-based treatment planning. Geries Shaheen is a Licensed Professional Counselor and Nationally Certified Counselor operating in and around St. Louis Missouri. Geries holds his MA in Professional Counseling from Lindenwood University, BA in Intercultural Studies from Lincoln Christian University, and holds a certificate in Life Coaching, Geries provides life coaching services to clients online globally. Geries is EMDR trained and DBT Certified, practicing from a TIC lens.
More Posts