Geries Shaheen • May 13, 2017

Exploring Therapeutic Intent

People with authority can influence the world in 100 days, marketing Mad Men are able to persuade the world to purchase $1,000 Playoff tickets, therapists on the other hand, well, we're a different bird all together. Therapist are the ones who understood Willy Wonka when he said "Oh, you can’t get out backwards. You’ve got to go forwards to go back." It can be incredibly difficult for the untrained eye to observe subtle patterns, hidden power struggles, and unwanted cognitive distortions.

You would think with those abilities a therapist would want to influence the world. Think again. What is influence truly? We can define influence through the method and lens of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.

Ethos - This is when people use the platform of ethics and credibility to bring change to a person/ mentality/ situation.

Pathos - This is when people use various emotions (fear management, bandwagon, Repetition) to bring change to a person/ mentality/ situation.

Logos - This is when people use reason and logic (Facts and Stats, claims, general logic) to bring change to a persons/ mentality/ situation.

These are all very effective tools, and truly do influence clients. But is it the source and true definition of therapy?

You may also assume a therapist would want to persuade clients into betterment. Hold your horses.

When you take a deeper look into the art of persuasion, you find a handful of methods that have been proven to work. Persuasion techniques such as Reciprocity, Authority, Consistency, Scarcity, Liking, and Consensus.

Reciprocity - A waiter brings you your check, and includes a mint or chocolate, you are more likely (statistically) to leave a larger tip.

Authority - Someone placed in a powerful position requests something of you, you are more likely to follow through.

Consistency - You are asked to place a window sticker on your car to promote a radio station. You are then more likely to listen to that radio station.

Scarcity - "Ladies and Gentlemen, this is an Iphone! Most people have one, and their lives are so much better for it. You, on the other hand, lack an Iphone." This technique plays on the element of void and fear. I don't have xyz, so I must attain it.

Liking - Someone gives you compliments and positive reflections, you are more likely to continue being around them.

Consensus - A hotel room door sign reads "75% of guests reuse their towels to help the environment." You are more likely to reuse your towel.

All of these techniques work to persuade people.They exist all around us in many different ways. But is that the crux of therapy?

This leaves us with what I believe is the most reflective term in defining therapy- Empowerment . That is where, in my mind, true health exists. When a client feels empowered, understood, accepted, ...

Empowerment revolves around the client , not the treatment or modality. At the end of the day I am not aiming to influence my clients, or to persuade my client. My source of therapy is to empower. Empowerment plays on empathy, mirroring, exploring sources of self value and self strength, and developing the inner self in face of the external world.

I was raised towards the end of a generation which believed you must pull yourself up by your own bootstraps. I harp on how harmful that mentality can be. However, in treatment it could be very effective to define what bootstraps are, and possible methods to get them up. This could include, but is not limited to, the development of self reliance.

Empathy

Brene Brown does a fantastic job explaining empathy. She frames it around the idea of crawling down into the client's pit and sitting with them, versus just looking into the pit the client is sitting in, Empathy is not something you show, but rather something you exhibit, or embody. The difference means saying "Wow, this dark pit is lonely, I can understand that." rather than "Wow, that stinks that your in a lonely pit, at least you're still alive!?"

Mirroring

If you haven't had the chance to watch Fritz Perls in a therapy session, please take a moment and watch how he holds up a figurative mirror and sometimes even mimics the clients behavioral mannerisms. Mirroring shows the client their selves in a reflective way. This grants the client the ability to filter out what benefits them and what doesn't. This helps the client to understand and develop their self.

Fritz Perls & Gloria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBqk-TZCpFA

Self Value / Self Strength

After a few sessions, I develop "life timelines" with clients. We roll out a long scroll of paper, and make a line down the center. The first dot is the day they were born, the dot furthermost to the right is present day. Placing major life events on paper offers a great deal of clarity! A client is able to see their hurt, and their joy. Their weakness and their strengths. It is easy to pin point weaknesses, they stick out like a sore thumb. Strengths however can be tricky, which is why this timeline is so powerful. The points of weaknesses do not solely exist by themselves. After every weakness or heartache exists the next movement in life. A new job, a partner, improved health, a degree, etc. You can find drives, attributes, supports, all through this timeline. Then, the most beautiful part, the client is able to draft or script their own narrative. "What will the next dot be on this page?! Write it!

Inner Self vs External World

Dallas Willard was an American philosopher who developed a model of self thinking that I believe is incredibly valid. Through his model he posed the question, "what is at our center?". The model showcases a circle within a circle, and so on until you see a dot in the middle. The idea suggested what is at our center fuels what impacts us, and how/ if we impact the world!

here it is

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FQ4MxhOn2EA/Td75csA6IzI/AAAAAAAAAcI/I2aNtv--RcQ/s1600/dwperson.png

Willard coined the model Spheres of Influence. The model itself appears very spiritual, which is not a bad thing. However, this model can be used in many different ways. It can showcase what is at the center of our selves, and then offer the opportunity to replace it with something stronger, tweak it, accept it, come to terms with it, be angry by it, etc. For some, their inner self is power, compassion, Jesus, instincts, drive, a memory.

Once this happens, the individual is more equipped and empowered to allow this inner self to impact the external world, rather than live constantly under the weight of things from the external world impacting them.

Disclaimer: In this effort to empower others, we must keep a firm grasp on legalities, self harm or harm to others, clients well being, etc.

So here is a parting question for you!

Have you learned your client deeply enough to come from their moral ground? If a persons mentality is not in their own best interest or actually harms their well being, do you feel trained enough to work on restructuring their perspective in a non biased manner? If so, how have you done this? I would love to know of any tools or techniques!



Geries Shaheen is a Provisionally Licensed Professional Counselor operating in and around St. Louis Missouri. Geries teaches psych classes as an Adjunct at Saint Louis Christian College and offers Adolescent/ Family Therapy through Preferred Family Healthcare . Geries holds his BA in Intercultural Studies from Lincoln Christian University, and his MA in Professional Counseling from Lindenwood University. Holding a certificate in Life Coaching, Geries provides life coaching services to clients online throughout the nation.

Pioneer Counseling Blog

By Geries Shaheen • October 22, 2026
For a new client (and therapist), the first session can carry plenty of unspoken questions: What am I expected to share? Who will hear about it? What if I’m not ready to talk? Before exploring what brought someone through the door, therapists have an opportunity to make the process clearer, and invite the client into a working partnership. A thoughtful introduction brings together warmth, informed consent, professional boundaries, and client choice. For provisionally licensed counselors, it also means explaining supervision in a way that feels transparent and reassuring. The template below offers a starting point for that conversation. Adapt it to your voice, your practice’s policies, and the person sitting across from you, leaving room for questions along the way. “Hi, I’m _____, a provisional licensed professional counselor in Missouri. I’m glad we could find a time to meet. “You mentioned _____ in your intake paperwork. Today, I’d like to understand those concerns in your own words, learn what you hope will change, and talk together about how I can help. “Before we begin, I want to review a few things about counseling. I practice under the clinical supervision of _____, LPC. My supervisor reviews my clinical work, and we may discuss your care and review relevant records as part of that supervision. “Counseling can help you understand patterns, develop skills, and work toward changes that matter to you. Sometimes discussing difficult experiences brings up uncomfortable feelings. You can tell me when something feels overwhelming, ask to pause, or let me know when an approach is not helping. “Your privacy matters. What you share is confidential, with certain limits explained in our consent paperwork. These include legally required reports of suspected abuse or neglect, situations involving serious safety concerns that may require protective action, and disclosures required by applicable law or a court order. If a legal request for information comes in, we review the requirements before responding. Whenever possible and appropriate, I will discuss a necessary disclosure with you first. “You can talk openly about thoughts of suicide or harming yourself. Having those thoughts does not automatically mean hospitalization; I will ask questions so we can understand your safety needs and determine the appropriate support. “I use _____ approaches. I’ll explain what I recommend, why it may help, and any relevant risks or alternatives. You can ask questions, decline an intervention, and give me feedback. “You’re in the captain’s chair when it comes to your goals and choices. My role is to bring structure, clinical guidance, and attention to safety. We’ll develop a treatment plan together and revisit it as your needs change. If we find that another therapist or service would better meet your needs, we can discuss that and appropriate referrals. “[Review session arrangements, fees, communication boundaries, emergency procedures, and any setting-specific confidentiality policies.] “What questions or concerns do you have about what we’ve reviewed? Are you comfortable proceeding? “What brings you here at this point in your life, and what would you most like help with?” Additional checkboxes: For the remaining first-session checklist, I would add: ☐ Session length, frequency, fees, insurance, and cancellation expectations. ☐ How to contact the therapist, expected response times, and what to do during an emergency or outside office hours. ☐ How records are maintained, who can access them, and any applicable billing disclosures. ☐ Questions, understanding, and documented consent to proceed. ☐ When applicable: telehealth location/privacy/disconnection procedures; guardian involvement and minor confidentiality; couples/group confidentiality policies; mandated treatment and what gets reported to the referring party. ☐ Separate explanation and consent for recording or observation, if used. A clear introduction sets the stage. How you manage the rest of the session helps turn those words into a therapeutic experience. Here are ten practical tips for keeping initial sessions welcoming, purposeful, and within the allotted time. Set a flexible agenda together. Briefly explain what today will include: introductions, informed consent, understanding the client’s concerns, and identifying next steps. Ask what the client most wants to make sure you address. Maintain a steady cadence. Give clients room to think, feel, and respond while keeping an eye on the clock. Use gentle transitions rather than rushing through questions or allowing the opening discussion to consume the entire session. Make time checks collaborative. Try, “We have about twenty minutes left. What feels most important to spend that time on?” This helps clients participate in prioritizing the conversation. Prepare the client for the ending. Offer a reminder about ten minutes before the session ends, then begin closing with enough time to summarize, check emotional readiness, and discuss next steps. A predictable ending helps prevent the client from feeling abruptly cut off. Be thoughtful about opening difficult material late in the session. If a significant concern emerges near the end, acknowledge its importance and assess immediate needs. Collaborate on what can be addressed today and what needs dedicated time next session. Safety concerns require appropriate assessment and action regardless of the clock. Take concise, precise working notes. Capture clinically relevant themes, meaningful changes, interventions provided, the client’s response, and follow-up needs. Brief phrases can support accurate progress-note writing later without turning the session into a transcription exercise. Store all notes according to practice policy and privacy requirements. Keep your attention with the client. Explain why you may jot down a few notes, maintain natural eye contact, and pause writing during emotionally significant moments. Your notes should support your presence in the room. Check understanding in small pieces. Pause during the introduction and informed-consent discussion. “What questions does that bring up?” often invites more conversation than “Does that make sense?” Give the client space to clarify concerns before moving on. Reflect before moving to solutions. Summarize what you understand and ask whether you have it right. Initial sessions can feel crowded with assessment tasks; a brief reflection helps the client feel heard and keeps your clinical understanding grounded in their experience. Close with a shared summary and a clear next step. Identify the main themes, ask what felt useful or difficult, and agree on the next focus. Confirm scheduling and any between-session plan. Complete the progress note promptly afterward, while your recollection is fresh. Use OARS to keep the conversation collaborative. Incorporate open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, and summaries throughout the session. Balance questions with reflections so the client feels heard rather than interviewed. Affirm specific strengths and efforts, and use summaries to check your understanding and transition between topics. Maintain an ongoing mental status lens. Quietly observe the client’s presentation throughout the session, including appearance, behavior, speech, mood and affect, thought process, attention, and orientation. Integrate these observations naturally rather than treating the Mental Status Examination (MSE) as a separate interrogation. Ask direct questions when clarification is needed, and document only what you observed or assessed; areas such as thought content, perception, and safety cannot be established through observation alone. Begin developing a diagnostic formulation. Organize the information gathered into possible explanations for the client’s concerns. Consider symptom duration, severity, functional impact, history, cultural context, and potential medical or substance-related contributors. Keep early impressions tentative, distinguish the client’s report from your observations, and identify what additional assessment is needed. Bring diagnostic questions and competing explanations to supervision rather than rushing to a conclusion. The first session does not need to answer every question or uncover every part of a client’s story. It should give the client a clearer understanding of counseling, an opportunity to feel heard, and a voice in what happens next. For developing therapists, balancing connection, assessment, documentation, and time takes practice. Use this introduction and these tips as a flexible guide, then bring your questions and observations to supervision. Notice what helped the conversation flow, where you felt rushed, and what you want to approach differently next time. Aim to end the session with the client knowing three things: what to expect, how they can participate, and that their concerns have been taken seriously. Geries Shaheen is a Licensed Professional Counselor and Nationally Certified Counselor operating in and around St. Louis Missouri. Geries holds his MA in Professional Counseling from Lindenwood University, BA in Intercultural Studies from Lincoln Christian University, and holds a certificate in Life Coaching, Geries provides life coaching services to clients online globally. Geries is EMDR trained and DBT Certified, practicing from a TIC lens.
By Geries Shaheen • August 11, 2026
Conversations about DSM-6 are growing louder in professional spaces . Industry leaders, researchers, and clinicians are sharing insights about what the next revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders may look like. Some projections suggest a potential release window around 2029 to 2030 , though the American Psychiatric Association has not formally confirmed a publication date. For Licensed Professional Counselors, it is important to distinguish between confirmed information and thoughtful speculation. What follows is a grounded overview of both.  What Is Officially Confirmed There has been talks of the next DSM potentially being names something totally different, as well as potentially being a living breathing document housed online rather than a printed material. This has led to thoughts that it will include a full structural overhaul as it aims to find a balance between psychiatric insight as well as lived experience data. At the moment, there has been no official announcement of: A finalized DSM-6 release date A confirmed structural overhaul A change in name Adoption of biomarkers as diagnostic requirements The APA has historically used multi-year committee processes for revision, as documented during the development of DSM-5 (Regier et al., 2013, American Journal of Psychiatry). Any specific timeline, including projections of 2029 to 2030, remains speculative unless formally announced by the APA. Documented Criticisms of the DSM Many of the concerns you listed are well documented in peer-reviewed literature, including in the American Journal of Psychiatry. Historically cited critiques include: • The DSM uses a categorical model, which may not fully capture dimensional or nuanced symptom presentations. • Emphasis on diagnostic reliability has sometimes been prioritized over diagnostic validity. • Limited integration of biological markers despite advances in neuroscience. • Heavy reliance on expert consensus panels. • Concerns about Western cultural bias in diagnostic framing. These critiques have appeared in academic discussions surrounding DSM-5 and broader psychiatric nosology debates (Hyman, 2010; Regier et al., 2013). What is important to note is that these criticisms are part of ongoing scholarly dialogue. They do not automatically predict specific DSM-6 changes. Themes Being Discussed in Professional Circles While not formally confirmed, several themes are widely discussed among researchers and leaders: 1. Greater Dimensional Integration DSM-5 already introduced cross-cutting symptom measures and severity scales. Continued movement toward dimensional models is supported in academic literature (Krueger & Markon, 2014). A future DSM may further integrate dimensional frameworks alongside categorical diagnoses. 2. Stronger Alignment with ICD There has been ongoing effort to harmonize DSM diagnostic codes with the International Classification of Diseases, maintained by the World Health Organization. Future revisions may continue this integration to improve global diagnostic consistency. 3. Inclusion of Biomarkers Despite significant neuroscience research, no current psychiatric diagnosis relies on validated biomarkers. The National Institute of Mental Health developed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to explore biologically informed models. However, RDoC remains a research framework and is not a diagnostic manual. Any integration of biomarkers into DSM-6 would require strong empirical validation, and no official confirmation currently exists that biomarkers will be required for diagnosis. 4. Cultural and Social Determinants DSM-5-TR expanded cultural formulation tools and updated language related to gender and diversity. Ongoing discourse suggests future editions may further incorporate cultural, socioeconomic, and environmental determinants of mental health. 5. Lived Experience Input There is broader movement in healthcare toward incorporating lived experience perspectives. While stakeholder feedback has been part of past revisions, there has been no formal announcement detailing the extent of lived experience integration for DSM-6. The direction of greater inclusivity aligns with contemporary healthcare standards but remains under development. Autism and Potential Diagnostic Shifts Speculation regarding updates to Autism Spectrum Disorder criteria reflects ongoing research around gender differences, masking, and underdiagnosis in women and people of color. Research literature supports the idea that autism presentations may differ across populations. However, there is currently no official confirmation that DSM-6 criteria changes will create a diagnostic surge. Any future criteria updates would require field trials and empirical validation before implementation. Committee Structures The APA historically forms workgroups and task forces organized by diagnostic categories and thematic areas. Planned improvement committees include the "Structure and Dimensions committee", "Functioning and Quality of life committee" "Biomarkers and Biological factors committee" " Socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental determinants of mental health committee". What LPCs Should Do Now Continue practicing under DSM-5-TR standards. Strengthen dimensional assessment skills and measurement-based care. Stay informed through official APA channels and peer-reviewed publications. Approach social media claims with professional caution. :) It is reasonable to expect that DSM-6 will aim to reflect scientific advances, cultural responsiveness, and improved diagnostic validity. However, until the American Psychiatric Association releases formal statements, timelines, or draft criteria, any detailed structural predictions remain speculative. For Licensed Professional Counselors, preparation is less about anticipating dramatic changes and more about maintaining strong assessment practices, cultural competence, and evidence-based treatment planning. Geries Shaheen is a Licensed Professional Counselor and Nationally Certified Counselor operating in and around St. Louis Missouri. Geries holds his MA in Professional Counseling from Lindenwood University, BA in Intercultural Studies from Lincoln Christian University, and holds a certificate in Life Coaching, Geries provides life coaching services to clients online globally. Geries is EMDR trained and DBT Certified, practicing from a TIC lens.
More Posts